Carbon dating is a flawed process Xxx dating and chat sight
If you have any more questions about it don't hesitate to write.
(2.) I just listened to a series of lectures on archaeology put out by John Hopkins Univ.
One of the impressive points Whitewall makes is the conspicuous absence of dates between 4,500 and 5,000 years ago illustrating a great catastrophe killing off plant and animal life world wide (the flood of Noah)!
I hope this helps your understanding of carbon dating.
Fw-300 .qstn-title #ya-trending-questions-show-more, #ya-related-questions-show-more #ya-trending-questions-more, #ya-related-questions-more /* DMROS */ .
The following material has been taken from a sheet entitled Several Faulty Assumptions Are Used in all Radiometric Dating Methods.
If something carbon dates at 7,000 years we believe 5,000 is probably closer to reality (just before the flood).
(4.) Traditional 14C testing assumes equilibrium in the rate of formation and the rate of decay.Example: wood found in a grave of known age by historically reliable documents is the standard for that time for the C14 content.This standard content of C14 can then be used for wood not associated with a historically documented date.The argument may be compared to filling a barrel which has numerous small holes in its sides.We stick the garden hose in and turn it on full blast.
After all, this what the archeologist guessed in their published books.